My first certification July 12, 2009
Posted by deepstop in Training.Tags: PADI, Nitrox, SCUBA, Diving, Dive Training, Scuba Diving, Enriched Air, Scuba Training, Scuba Instructor, Sport, EANx
add a comment
I certified my first student on Wednesday. He completed an Enriched Air Diver course in 5 hours of classroom time. The PADI recommended course time is 12 hours. I remember my own took about an hour and half, but I did all the reading, exercises and knowledge reviews in advance.
If you go through the complete curriculum, it is quite involved. Even more so if you answer all the student’s questions. Being a technical diver it is quite easy to get into detailed explanations beyond the scope of the course. I did this a bit, because my student (I only had one) was interested and appeared to be absorbing it pretty well. His biggest challenge was lining up the rows and columns on the various dive tables, but he understood the concept of EAD, MOD, Contingency depth, CNS percentage, etc., without difficulty.
Iain was certified one year later than me, in 1983, and has done a lot of diving around Vancouver Island and in other places. He lost the use of his legs in an accident a while ago, and last fall decided to go through the entire certification process again to make sure he could dive safely in spite of the disability. I remember when the call went out for divemasters to help in the pool when he was going through it, but was unfortunately tied up that weekend and couldn’t make it.
He told me that both he and his wife used up their air slowly, and found that the NDL was limiting their dive times, and so wanted to get EAN certified. I recommended he invest in a computer as well, but he didn’t seem convinced. Strange that, as I done of lot of dives on air within my computer’s NDL that lasted an hour, even when the first phase was in the 80-100 foot range.
Anyway, that’s one down, and 24 to go before I can get my MSDT. I’ve kept a copy of his temporary certification for my own posterity. If I keep teaching students one at a time It’s going to be a long hard road…
My first certification
I certified my first student on Wednesday. He completed an Enriched Air Diver course in 5 hours of classroom time. The PADI recommended course time is 12 hours. I remember my own took about an hour and half, but I did all the reading, exercises and knowledge reviews in advance.
If you go through the complete curriculum, it is quite involved. Even more so if you answer all the student’s questions. Being a technical diver it is quite easy to get into detailed explanations beyond the scope of the course. I did this a bit, because my student (I only had one) was interested and appeared to be absorbing it pretty well. His biggest challenge was lining up the rows and columns on the various dive tables, but he understood the concept of EAD, MOD, Contingency depth, CNS Clock, etc., without difficulty.
Iain was certified one year later than me, in 1983, and has done a lot of diving around Vancouver Island and in other places. He lost the use of his legs in an accident a while ago, and last fall decided to go through the entire certification process again to make sure he could dive safely in spite of the disability. I remember when the call went out for divemasters to help in the pool, but was unfortunately tied up that weekend and couldn’t make it.
He told me that both he and his wife used up their air slowly, and found that the NDL was limiting their dive times, and so wanted to get EAN certified. I recommended he invest in a computer as well, but he didn’t seem convinced. Strange that, as I done of lot of dives within my computer’s NDL that lasted an hour, even when the first phase was in the 80-100 foot range.
Anyway, that’s one down, and 24 to go before I can get my MSDT. If I keep teaching students one at a time It’s going to be a long hard road…
In Pursuit of Perfection July 11, 2009
Posted by deepstop in Equipment.Tags: Decompression, Dive Computer, SCUBA, Scuba Diving, Scuba Equipment, Shearwater Pursuit, Technical Diving, Trimix
add a comment
As mentioned a couple of days ago, upgraded software has come out for the Shearwater Pursuit, and I’ve just gone through the upgrade process.
Once the free upgrade has been downloaded and unpacked from the Shearwater web site, the nextstep is to make sure you have an Infrared port on your computer. My Dell Latitude D620 has a darkened window on the left hand side that looks suspiciously like an infrared port, but I can’t find any mention of it in the Windows-XP configuration.
Shearwater thoughtfully provided a infrared USB dongle for just this circumstance, along with a mini-CD with the driver and a short USB extension cable (in case you’re using a desktop system with the ports in the back or some other inconvenient arrangement. The manual says that you can do a network installation of the infrared driver but this didn’t work for me so I used the mini-CD.
Then I ran the upgrade program which I’d unpacked from the download file, and it found the infrared port (it also sparked off a new installation procedure for a serial port over IR connection, which I thought about cancelling but instead opted to go ahead with a network installation while the upgrade was running – a risky procedure which worked fine). I then put the Pursuit into upgrade mode and the software loaded in about 2 minutes.
Now finished with the computer, the Pursuit started a length decryption process. Both the download and the decrypt show a counter so you get the good feeling that something is happening. The counter runs very quickly during the download and much slower (about 5 seconds per count) in decrypt mode. The counter goes to about 312 in decrypt, which indeed takes most of the maximum half hour advertised by the documentation.
The Pursuit then asks to confirm the clearing of its internal decompression model (”Tissues Cleared”) and to confirm the upgrade reset, and then you’re done.
The first difference I notice while on the surface is the altitude readout. That’s pretty cool! It is reading 999 feet right now, compared to the elevation of my house at 952 feet that Google Maps advertises. As the barometric pressure right now is slightly above normal at 102.13kPa, it looks like it’s reading slightly high, but this is diving, not flying, and as I’m slightly elevated from the ground where I’m sitting it’s likely within the tolerances for altimeter setting, which is pretty good, I think. It’s certainly a big improvement over the 1 mountain, 2 mountain or 3 mountain display you get on the Apeks Quantum.
The new screen after the altitude display (which has been added to the current gradient factor on the 3rd screen) shows the “stored surface altitude in millibars and ATA” at the time the computer was turned on. I was a little confused at first because this was showing 1013 after the upgrade, then 999 after I cycled the power. I thought, why it it now showing the altitude in feet, when before it was millibars? I realised though, that this was just coincidence and it is indeed reading 999 millibars where I am sitting, exactly the same as the number of feet!
OK, I have now discovered that both readings are in millibars. If you want to get the scoop on the Shearwater Pursuit Rebreather World is the place to go. Even for an open circuit diver it’s a very informative forum, Bruce, the CEO of Shearwater, is very active on it.
In setup, I’ve already set the GF99 feature, which shows the gradient at your current depth to allow you to work out a faster time to the surface. This number replaces the NDL when the computer goes into deco. So instead of using the gradient factor that is preset in the dive profile, you can exceed in whatever amount you desire to speed your way to the surface. I suppose you could also use it to be more conservative, selecting a lower gradient factor that the computer wants.
I’ll take my computer to the dive shop and give out upgrades to whoever needs one.
Out to play at Big Bay Point July 10, 2009
Posted by deepstop in Dive Log.Tags: Adventure, Big Bay Point, Brockville, Dive Training, Divemaster, Diving, Dry Suit, Lake Simcoe, Nitrox, Outdoors, SCUBA, Scuba Diving, Scuba Training, Sport, St. Lawrence River, Training, Wreck Diving
add a comment
On August 2nd, 2008 I was back to Big Bay Point, equipped with a bit of enriched air left over from diving the 3 wrecks (Gaskin, Kinghorn and Daryaw) on our wreck diving course in the St. Lawrence River near Brockville.
This time, Dave, one of the new instructors at the shop (now departed for the west coast, I hear) had some students out, and being first in the water I had the honour of setting the dive flag, which was my first dive to 27 feet lasting 5 minutes on EAN26.
Not having to switch tanks, of course, almost an hour later we were in the water with the students doing open water dive 1, which lasted 25 minutes and went to 34 feet. I’m not sure where we went to get the extra depth but we must have done a short tour of some kind. The water temperature on both dives bottomed out at 18C so it was quite pleasant and could have been a wet suit dive, but I was in the dry suit in anticipation of great depth.
I was joined at that point by Matt and Andrew, and we took off down the line to 84 foot, using my last bottle of enriched air (EAN36). The water temperature was only 10C (50F) at that depth but the dry suit and hood kept me nice and warm. We dispensed with the safety stop because we stopped at 20 feet to play around. I shot a lift bag for practice but didn’t do it very well. It was pretty limp even with the expansion on the way to the surface. I decided then to get some more practice in with it.
We were out of the water at 12:06 and I headed home for lunch. Next stop, more wreck diving in Tobermory.
Underwater Pursuit July 9, 2009
Posted by deepstop in Equipment.Tags: Adventure, Big Bay Point, Brockville, Decompression, Dive Computer, Diving, Lake Simcoe, Outdoors, SCUBA, Scuba Diving, Scuba Equipment, Shearwater Pursuit, Sport, St. Lawrence River, Technical Diving
add a comment
My first impressions of diving my new Shearwater Pursuit were about what I expected. This display is a bit harder to read than I’d hoped when the water is dark, but that is mostly down to my deteriorating close-up vision which is a natural result of aging. I think I’m going to have to bite the bullet and get a prescription mask, or at least one of those stick on things that gives some magnification when looking through the bottom of the lens.
I think that Shearwater could develop a bigger font for open circuit divers, as the middle row of the display is unused because it’s dedicated to rebreather oxygen sensors. Doing so would detract from the keep it simple philosophy of the computer, which is one of the keys to reliability, so I’m not going to try to start a user campaign to make it happen.
Some attention is required to make sure the straps are tight enough so the computer doesn’t roll around on the wrist. I have the same issue with the Quantum and it’s actually easier to do on the Pursuit because the straps are made of stretch material, but they should be tightened snugly.
I didn’t get the chance to see the decompression algorithm at work because I was busy with a student on these dives. The log agreed in depth, time and temperature with my Quantum, after making allowances for the fresh water setting in the Quantum vs. the salt water setting on the Pursuit. The Pursuit is getting support for fresh water one day, I hear, and this will be available as an update for download.
Another thing I noticed was that because I was diving in fairly shallow water a lot of the time and surfaced a bunch of times, the Pursuit logged several dives while the Quantum treated it as one. It’s not a big deal but I prefer the behaviour of the Quantum. Fortunately, I just received this email update from Shearwater via my local dive shop.
We have just completed version 67.
It was originally released as version 62, but there were two bugs that were difficult for us to fix because we couldn’t reproduce them.
Several users were very helpful in providing exact sequences of events that produced the bugs to the extent that we were finally able to reproduce the bugs.
Thank you very much for your efforts.
Please download the release notes. There are a lot of new features added and some refinement of existing features that make the operation even easier.
Some highlights are better calibration, altitude support for calibration and decompression, and support for surfacing during a dive and continuing the log with the same dive number. There is more in the release notes.
This release should also have a feature I know I’m going to appreciate, which is to provide additional deco information based on removing the gradient factors from the algorithm and using the “pure” Bühlmann model. Having this gives a reasonably safe (although less so than with the GF) exit from the water when there’s reason to, like being low on gas, dry suit flood, or just bored. I’m only half-joking with this latter situation as I can see a time when I’d incur a really long deco obligation and may want to push it a little, and this feature would give a lower limit to my deco time. My friends who have Cochrans are out of the water in no time compared to me and my Quantum, but I’m looking for a happy medium because I’m not as young as I used to be.
So that’s all for now. I’ll give a proper report when I go diving in the St. Lawrence again, which will be next weekend, where I’ll definitely be putting the decompression algorithm to the test.
Wreck Training on the Daryaw July 7, 2009
Posted by deepstop in Dive Log, Shipwrecks, Technical Diving, Training.Tags: Adventure, Apeks Quantum, Brockville, Cochran Computer, Daryaw, Decompression, Dive Computer, Dive Training, Diving, Nitrox, Outdoors, SCUBA, Scuba Diving, Scuba Training, Shipwreck, Sport, St. Lawrence River, Technical Diving, Training, Wreck Diving, Wreck Penetration
3 comments
This dive, on July 20th, 2008, was strangely enough one of my favourites of the season. The mission was simply to hold my position inside the wreck of the Henry C. Daryaw, located at around 90′ below the surface of the St. Lawrence River near Brockville, and make sure that the wreck diving students didn’t go further into the wreck than they were supposed to, and to be there to assist in case of problems.
Simple enough, though we had 4 buddy teams come through twice each, giving each diver a chance to lead the penetration and lay their penetration line. I had done the same course the year before and this was only my third time inside the wreck. Later that same year, in September 2007, I’d qualified for my technical diving certification, and early in 2008 my Divemaster rating. This gave me the opportunity to assist with the dive, as we were required to stay under for so long that multiple tanks, gas switches and decompression were all required.
Brad was instructing with Dave assisting, and Andrew and I were the safety divers. Andrew, an AI but not quite finished his technical training and also using a high capacity single cylinder, pulled the duty to shuttle students from the buoy line to the door where they were to enter. As mentioned earlier, I got the role of blocker at the turn from the passageway leading astern on the starboard side of the wreck to an mechanical room amidships. It was there I was to remain for two hours. To shorten our decompression time, we dived Nitrox with 35% Oxygen.
Dave went it first, but he thought the door to the mechanical room was closer to the entrance than it was. I was following him, with Brad behind me. Unfortunately, Dave thought I’d gone too far and Brad thought (correctly) that I hadn’t gone far enough and I found myself being shoved from both directions. This resulted in a silt-out with near zero visibility. Dave finally figured it out and Brad got me to where he thought I should be, and there I was feeling pretty lonely in complete isolation without being able to see anything. I held on to my stage bottle for comfort knowing that I had enough air to last a long while and concentrated on controlling my breathing.
I remember getting that “what I am doing here?” feeling that I got the year before when I first went into the wreck. This time I had no penetration line and in the complete darkness I felt isolated and alone. Brad, who’s been in there a bunch of times, came over and I saw his hand well enough to see his OK sign. I gave him one back, but he had to reach out and feel my hand to know that. By that time, the silt had settled very slightly and some outlines became visible, and I started to be more comfortable.
After a while I could see Dave in his position, or at least his light, and several minutes later the first pair of divers came in. They had the hardest time because the wreck still had lots of silt stirred up. As their light approached, I pointed in the direction of their destination while shining my light on my hand. They got the message.
A couple of times I had to direct divers through the correct door. Bruce in particular seemed really set on going through the next door down and I had to push him through the right one (which was the one on the left). There was a long time between divers – I think we’d allowed too much in the planning of the dives, so a lot of the time was spent waiting around. The depth was around 85 feet (more on my feet, less on my head), so I started racking up deco time pretty fast in the second hour despite the Nitrox. After my doubles dropped to 800PSI, I clipped the AL80 that had been sitting at my feet the whole time onto my BC, and switched over, taking it down to 500 PSI by the time I’d finished with it.
The deco stop was the longest I’d ever done at about an hour, based on my Apeks Quantum’s calculations. Most of this was at 10 feet. We weren’t carrying any richer mixes with us so I couldn’t accelerate it. Dave and Brad, using Cochran dive computers which have pretty aggressive profiles, were done in about 20 minutes. And so I sat. Steve, our on-board Divemaster, came down to see how we were doing. He was there when Brad’s fin came off due to a broken strap or buckle or something and he went to fetch it. I then saw him swimming hard back toward the line in the current, but making little progress. I held out my had and pulled him back in (Steve swears I extended just one finger, which I may well have done, but I don’t remember that).
We hung off the buoy line while we off-gassed. Most of the time I had my eyes closed and lying on my back,because my AL80 stage bottles were near empty and getting buoyant. Three hours and 3 minutes after getting in the water, I was back on the boat. I’m looking forward to doing it again.
Man uses Scuba gear to escape fire July 6, 2009
Posted by deepstop in Miscellany.Tags: Scuba Equipment
add a comment
I’ve always thought that it could be done. I’d have to be trapped in the basement for this to work for me, as that’s where I usually keep the gear (when it’s not in the car), and in the summer at least the tanks are usually in the garage.
First day teaching in the water July 5, 2009
Posted by deepstop in Dive Log, Training.Tags: Big Bay Point, Diving, Dry Suit, Lake Simcoe, Outdoors, PADI, PADI Assistant Instructor, SCUBA, Scuba Diving, Scuba Instructor, Scuba Training, Sport, Training
add a comment
Today, July 4th, 2009, was my first experience as an instructor in the water. It is a very different thing from being a certified assistant. To make things harder, the wind was blowing hard at Big Bay Point and at the surface the current was moving quickly, making underwater the best place to get around. Compounding it even further, I’d just gone out to the lake to dive with a guy who is starting out on doubles, so I wasn’t expecting to teach, and I ended up doing to Adventure Dives for his son Alex’ advanced course at the same time. Teaching in doubles made it even harder, although it provided built in redundant air supply for the deep dive.
Our plan was to do a Deep Dive, Search & Recovery Dive and a Nitrox Dive. We only did the first two, which is OK as Alex had done one dive (Underwater Navigation) at an earlier date, so he would not have been able to finish his 5 dives for his Advanced Scuba Diver Certification that day anyway (limit for training is 3 dives).
The deep dive itself was uneventful. There’s a line going to down to the depths of Big Bay Point to about 90′. We got to 88 feet where a skateboard is about the last thing to see. We compared depth gauges as required (my Shearwater Pursuit said 86 feet, which allowing for its salt water setting is the same as my Quantum reading 88 feet), and the colours of various objects, which has replaced the timed task for both the adventure dive and the first dive of the deep diving specialty. After this, and of course several SPG checks, we headed back up. I was going to show him around at 60 feet for a couple of minutes but he signalled 800 PSI left and I decided it was best to get up to the safety stop, which we did with him still having 500 PSI left.
The second dive was a little more challenging. We were doing a search and recovery, but on our way down we lost the lift bag that was stuffed into Alex’ BC. I left Alex with the 2 instructors and DM teaching the Open Water Class, and chased after it. It was more difficult that I’d imagined. The reason it had come loose (other than being a bit loose to start with) was that there was some air in it. It had floated a considerable distance in the wind and current, and by the time I’d retrieved it, the Open Water class had headed up and brought Alex with them, so I had to then swim back to the dock, fetch Alex, and head out again. As I was huffing and puffing there and back, I thought about how I’ve got to get my exercise discipline back again.
We made it to the boat lying some distance east of the training area at a depth of 30′, and I went through the knot tying exercises. Fortunately we’d practiced on land, and I’d recommended thin gloves, so he performed with flying colours. I then gently placed the weight belt I’d brought with me near the boat and had him search with a U pattern. After that I went a greater distance on the other side to drop the belt and Alex did a pendulum search with the line tied of to the boat. He found it in short order despite the visibility and he attached a line to the belt with bowline and to the lift bag with 2 half hitches.
Getting back to the ascent line was a chore as it is fair distance and we were swimming against the current. The line is sturdy though, and after some very slow swimming I took the bag and started pulling myself along the line, which was much faster and less taxing. We did our ascent there, and then struggled back to shore int he wind and current.
What did I learn? Not to use doubles for one thing, but today circumstances required me to use them because I wasn’t planning on teaching. I’m always amazed at how well the owner of our dive shop manoeuvres in them, but his weight relative to the tanks is much greater than mine, and I find them quite a load when I’m twisting and turning to help the students, even though I’m OK with normal diving. The extra effort to manage myself in the doubles (and in a dry suit, to boot) detracts from the attention I can give to the student.
Mind you, the next course I teach which will be wreck diving will be in my doubles, although I’ll be able to move easier in a wet suit than in the dry suit I used today.
I think the other thing I learned is that becoming a good instructor takes practice, just like it does to become a good diver. It’s no so much any particular skill, but getting into the rythym of it, remembering the little things, keeping it moving, etc. etc. As I alluded to above, you need to dive conservatively so you have some reserves to pay attention to the student. With so many things to remember this is difficult at first.
To top off the day I had left my keys with one of the other instructor’s gear, and didn’t tell him. While I had some of his equipment on the dive, he and the others left the site while I was underwater. One of the was nice enough to drive all the way from Newmarket which is almost an hour away (thanks again Marty). It made for a long afternoon as I was delayed about 2 1/2 hours. I whiled away the time tying knots and occasionally helping some students who were taking a class from another dive shop.
Wreck Training in Brockville: The Kinghorn July 4, 2009
Posted by deepstop in Dive Log, Shipwrecks, Technical Diving, Training.Tags: Adventure, Brockville, Decompression, Dive Training, Diving, Nitrox, Outdoors, SCUBA, Scuba Diving, Scuba Training, Shipwreck, Sport, St. Lawrence River, Technical Diving, Training, Wreck Diving
1 comment so far
I’ve never been on a diving trip to Brockville where I haven’t dived the Kinghorn at least once. It’s about 135′ long, with lots of openings in the deck through which to swim. Inside, it’s quite dark, and if you stir it up the black silt will reduce the visibility fast. If you’re careful though, and it’s a bright day, it’s easy enough to see around inside although a light is definitely needed.
This time I was helping the advanced wreck diving class. This wasn’t a technical class, as the students were all in regular scuba gear, but the instructors and divemasters were all decked out in their technical finery, including a bunch of extra tanks that were left lying on the deck to give us extra time and safety margins.
The exercise was the same one that we did on the Gaskin, with 4 buddy teams of students arriving one at a time, with each pair ascending, switching tanks and coming back down to do it again in reduced visibility. The pairs were separated and each under supervision would lay a penetration line through the wreck and then find their way back out with it while reeling it in. Again we used air enriched with Oxygen to keep our students from incurring decompression obligations and to reduce ours to a minimum.
At first I t tried to follow the divers through the wreck, but keeping out of their way in some of the tighter spaces was hard, and I felt like I was getting in the way. So after that I stayed just above the deck ready to enter if needed. The only real assistance I had to give was to one student who went through his air to quickly (I can report his air consumption has improved dramatically with more experience and he’ll soon be a divemaster). He was down to 300 psi so I gave him my long hose reg and took him up to the safety stop.
So I ended up making two dives after all.
Recreational Pursuits July 2, 2009
Posted by deepstop in Equipment, Technical Diving.Tags: Apeks Quantum, Buhlmann, Decompression, Dive Computer, Diving, Gradient Factors, Nitrox, Outdoors, SCUBA, Scuba Diving, Scuba Equipment, Scuba Instructor, Scuba Training, Shearwater, Shearwater Pursuit, Technical Diving, ZHL-16C
add a comment
I received this email from one of my fellow Shearwater Pursuit owners. There were 5 of us in all for the first order from my dive shop, including 1 SPOTCE for our course director who has a KISS rebreather, a SPOT for me for technical diving, although I’m not yet Trimix certified, and 3 SPONs for the recreational guys (2 instructors and a divemaster).
Guys
After talking with Andrew who after a NDL dive wearing the Shearwater (SPON) and the Apex Quantum found that the Shearwater to be more conservative than the Quantum I started to look at the GF that were preset (30:85) and while that might be appropriate for decompression dives I think that may be way too conservative for deeper NDL dives. It would make sense to me that a GF setting of 85:85 for those in Navy Seal shape or down to 80:80 for the rest of us. If I understood the literature this would give us a 20% safety margin from the theoretical M-values, please wade in with your thoughts. There is the trial & error method comparing other computers while on a dive as I would like to have my Shearwater to be in sync with my Quantum or the Cochran!
I had some questions that I thought I could get answered (found at the bottom of the email) that I sent to Shearwater at 9:45 pm on Canada Day, attached is their response received 25 minutes later WOW. Please look at my questions and then their answers.
Cheers
Marty
——- Forwarded message follows ——-
From: Shearwater Research <info@shearwaterresearch.com> To: <deleted>Date sent: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 22:10:17 -0400 Subject: SPON information
Hi Marty,
Happy Canada Day!
We do not have an official registration process. To receive information and news about updates and what’s new, please sign up for our newsletter on our website.
As far as the Fischer plug is concerned, loop the wire thru the slot in the bracket and crimp it down with the little attachment that’s in the bag. Or, loosen one of the screws that attach the bracket, loop the wire around that and tighten down. The plug is a friction fit and would be very difficult to pull out when it’s under pressure. In any event, the Fischer connection is hard potted and will not leak even if the plug is left off. The plug is to prevent the pins from salt water and eventual corrosion.
When speaking with Brett the other day, I mentioned to him that we are coming out with our own dive log program that will be offered free of charge. The third party program has caused our customers too many problems, we can no longer recommend it. Not to mention that he’s increased the price without advising us.
We are definitely targeting technical/decompression divers but are always thrilled when a nitrox diver purchases one of computers! Our factory default setting is 30/85. That’s a good conservative profile that works well for most folks, including recreational divers.
I’ve passed on your offer and information to Bruce. We are growing rapidly with lots of new ideas and plans for the future.
Thanks for buying one of our computers, I hope you enjoy diving with it.
Regards
Lynn
From: <deleted> Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 6:46 PM To: Shearwater Research Subject: Contact Form NotificationContact Form Staff Notification
A New Contact has signed up through your contact form
A Contact has signed up. Their information is below:
<contact info deleted>
Comments: I was one of the instructors who purchased Pursuit SPON from Colt Creek Diving in Newmarket Ontario the other day. I do have a few questions regarding the computer and it’s operation. 1) I did not see any registration forms nor did I see an online registration process. Is there one? 2) The Fischer connector SS cover, where is the recommended attachment point? 3) In your pricing information the HHS Software Corp Dive log manager is quoted at $25.00 CDN whereas on the HHS Software Corp web site the price is $45.00 US. Can we purchase the software directly from Shearwater? 4) When the computer is to be used in recreational diving (No decompression) are there any guidelines or recommendations for setting the Gradient Factors? I have looked at the recommended literature but it seems that all are discussing decompression diving. I look forward to your reply. It is nice to see a Canadian Company engaged in this type of specialty research. I am electronic PCB designer by trade and should the need ever arise I would be pleased to assist in the development of your product.

My New Shearwater Pursuit July 1, 2009
Posted by deepstop in Equipment, Technical Diving.Tags: Decompression, Dive Computer, Diving, SCUBA, Scuba Diving, Scuba Equipment, Shearwater Pursuit, Shearwater Research, Technical Diving, Trimix, VRx
3 comments
Consider this part one of at least a four part product review. This describes my out-of-the-box impressions of the Shearwater Pursuit. Part 2 will describe diving the unit within the no-decompression limit. Part 3 will cover decompression diving, and hopefully part 4 will be about the logging functions. Later on I might add deep diving and some day trimix diving.
It will be a few days before I dive it, but I’m now the proud owner of a Shearwater Pursuit SPOT. The SPOT is an open circuit only model, which is fine as I’m an open circuit only diver, with Trimix capability. I haven’t certified on Trimix yet, but will do so before too long, I’m sure, and I wanted my computer to be ready for it.
The computer is fairly large and fairly heavy. I find it a bit odd that the dimensions and weight are not found in the manual or on the Shearwater web site, maybe they don’t want to scare people off. Now that I have one I can tell you that it’s 3 1/4″ wide, 3 1/8″ long, and 1 1/4″ thick. The clear covering (acrylic, I suppose made of Lexan) over the screen is 1/4″ thick. As for weight I’d say about a pound, but I’m not a very good judge of weight. I calculate it displaces about 7 oz of water so it is probably quite negatively buoyant.
The manual doesn’t come with the unit but must be downloaded from the web site (I personally like this trend – always up to date, but more importantly you can read the manual before buying the product, which was a major influence on my purchase). It is very clear upon reading it that it has a bias towards closed circuit diving, as you have to pick out the bits that are applicable to open circuit divers. I think there probably should be a section catering to each, as an open circuit diver with no knowledge of CCR diving might have trouble figuring it out. It took me a while.
Operation of the unit (on the surface at least) is pretty easy. I really like the way the status displays can be cycled by pressing the right hand button without resorting to modes, sub-menus, and other contrivances to get the information you want. Definitely the thing for the narced-out deep air diver. Similarly, setup is pretty easy, with the left button getting involved to select the function you want. These have 1 level of sub menu as you cycle through the main menus with the left button and use the right one to select the one you want, then go back to the left button to cycle through the sub menu.
The Pursuit lets you do just about anything. It doesn’t lock you out no matter how far from the profile you have strayed, it lets you run all the setup menus (except shutting it off or changing the time of day) while submerged, including setting up gases. This means in addition to being able to control which of 5 gases you are calculating your decompression with, you can also change any of those gases while under water. It would be a pretty unusual situation for you to want to do this, but the Pursuit will let you do it if you want.
As I’ve mentioned before, one of the things I like the most is the decompression algorithm is based on published literature (Buhlmann ZHL16C with Erik Baker’s Gradient Factors) with no proprietary “secret sauce”. While some of these proprietary algorithms are no doubt valid and built with good intentions and real-world testing, unless they’re generally available to the scientific and diving communities I’d rather pass on them. I don’t want a black box telling me how to deco (the Pursuit does of course strongly resemble a black box but that’s not what I meant).
One other thing not mentioned in the manual is installing the cap on the Fischer connector on the left hand side, which presumably I need to install before I go diving! I know it seems obvious but you’d think the manual would at least give it a mention. Should I lubricate its little o-ring? I guess so.
The buttons on the unit are very flat, a striking contrast to the VRx with its thin, half inch throw stiffly sprung buttons. The Pursuit’s buttons don’t move when you press them, and so don’t have a positive feel to them. Still, I have become used to their operation very quickly. I like the fact that the only function that isn’t a simple push of either the left or the right is that to turn the computer on you need to press both at once. The VRx has short push, long push, left, right and both for all sorts of functions that seems way too complicated. The VRx also has very disturbing delays after a button push, often a different length of time even for the same function. As one friend put it, it kind of resembles MS-Windows for responsiveness. In contrast, the Pursuit has sub-second response to anything I thrown at it so far (remembering I haven’t taken it underwater yet), which is sufficient feedback to know that your button press has been effective.
The Pursuit is more like MS-DOS than Windows. If you like fancy graphics, colour, games, books and other nifty features this isn’t the computer for you. On a dive, with the open circuit model the main display shows Depth, Time, Stop Depth, Stop Time, Gas mix, No decompression limit and Time to surface, plus rudimentary graphics for battery life and ascent rate. In open circuit mode you can modify the last 3 numbers to give you the maximum depth, CNS%, and current PPO2 with a push of the right button. Push it again and you get the current gradient factors, and again gives you the temperature and the battery voltage. That’s it. There’s nothing else to display. Pushing the left button lets you do configuration in or out of the water.
The computer uses a 3.6 volt Lithium AA size battery. I don’t know how hard these things are to obtain locally, but they’re all over the Internet. If the Home Depot doesn’t have them then I’m sure the local photo store will. The two wrist straps are attached to the computer by a metal flange (shaped like a miniature backplate. They are made of stretch material and use squeeze clips like you find on a backplate harness.
The weaknesses I’ve seen so far? I can’t really tell from the manual what the computer will do at altitude. As I dive only in the sea or in Ontario lakes and rivers this isn’t a big concern for me, but the documentation should at least mention it. The Buhlmann algorithm was designed to work at altitude but I’m not convinced that the Time To Surface display would be accurate if the surface was well above sea level. There’s also no fresh water setting, although I hear it’s coming. This would give direct reading and logging of actual depth rather than reading slightly shallower than actual, but it has no meaningful affect on decompression.
The logging program is also a problem. Apparently the current one is so bad it is being withdrawn. It was only $25 but is an extra cost item. The computer interface comes with the unit. The logging program is being replaced by a new one which apparently will be $40, although the 5 people who bought this computer at our local shop are apparently getting a complimentary version. Shearwater Research also threw in a complimentary T-Shirt for the 5 of us.
So far there are no unpleasant surprises. The computer appears to be just what I expected, and I’m looking forward to using it underwater.

