jump to navigation

Scuba Diving in Cozumel – Columbia and Dalila Reefs December 19, 2008

Posted by Chris Sullivan in Dive Log.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Fortunately in 2006 the hurricanes left Cozumel alone, so our trip went ahead as planned. Mother nature didn’t cooperate fully, though, because at that time of year Cozumel gets frequent Nortes – steady north winds – and when they’re strong enough, close Cozumel’s  Harbour near La Caleta Marina. Unfortunately this was the case with my trip, so while I had 6 days of diving booked, I only managed to get in four.

My wife and I stayed at the Occidental Grand Cozumel, near the south end of the island on the west side. Except for a little bit of civilization when you turn the corner at the south end of the island, the west is not developed, although Donald Trump is apparently negotiating to have the land opened up for some mega-hotel. Hopefully the recession will put paid to that idea, at least for a while.

It turned out that the hotel was perfect for us. There are two restaurants in addition to the buffet, but we found the buffet much to our liking, and they changed at least some of the food daily, so we didn’t get bored with it. We’re not big fans of fancy dining or rich food, so the variety of the food on offer was great for us. The hotel has a decent beach, a couple of swimming pools, and to my shame I don’t know what the exercise facilities are like – although I’ll find out on my next trip  in February 2009.

Nice Marble Floor - too bad about the Tarantula

Nice Marble Floor - too bad about the Tarantula

Despite the relative luxury of the hotel, we were still aware of being in Mexico. One of the first things we had to deal with was my wife’s discovery of a big black spider in the bathroom. I took this picture of it and showed it to the concierge, who sent someone down with a dustpan and broom to shoo it away into the little garden just in front of the room. For the rest of the week we always turned the light on if we had to walk around the room at night!

I got hold of Christi, owner of Blue XT Sea Diving, on my first night, and diving was scheduled for the next day. With so many dive operators on the island, there’s a lot of competition, so service is really good. It was unfortunate on the first day due to the weather than I couldn’t be picked up on the dock as planned but had to take a taxi to La Caleta Marina to board the boat, followed by a long boat ride back to near the hotel. Palancar Reef is just offshore from the Grand.

Saw more turtles there than anywhere else

Saw more turtles there than anywhere else

What I liked the best about diving in Cozumel is drifting in the current. This is real lazy man’s diving – nice warm water at 85F (29C) and a chase boat meant my air supply lasted a long dive, so on the first day each dive lasted an hour, even though I reached depths of 94 feet and 72 feet on the first and second dives respectively, so my computer indicated a few minutes of deco on each of the dives.

Wilma opened up new swim-throughs in Cozumel

Wilma opened up new swim-throughs in Cozumel

By the end of the second dive it was 25 minutes to 3. The waves had calmed down by then so I was dropped off at the hotel dock, saving about an hour of travel.

Kinghorn & Vickery, St. Lawrence River Diving December 16, 2008

Posted by Chris Sullivan in Dive Log.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Monday of the Labour Day weekend wasn’t a particularly nice day in Brockville.  It was also the day that Steve Irwin was killed by a Stingray on the other side of the world. In the morning, when we dived the Kinghorn for a second time, the temperature was only 18C (65F), while the water was a little warmer at 19C (67F).

I had a new buddy this time. Steve is an instructor at my local dive shop, and was not as willing to enter the wreck as Greg had been. It was good to take another look at the wreck, and I remembered to note where the lines were to get back to the boat this time. Still diving my full-length 3mm Henderson Hyperstretch wet suit with a dry suit hood, the 25 minute dive was to about the same depth (92 feet) as Saturday’s dive. The visibility was good and I got on the boat with lots of air.

I have no recollection whatsoever of the next dive on the A.E. Vickery. This is one of the reasons I’m glad I’m blogging as it’s a great memory jog for me personally. With the knowledge that I’m going to be writing up my dives in this blog, I’ve been taking much better notes in my log book. It’s  also behind one my upcoming New Year’s Resolutions (I’ll list them all on New Year’s Day) which is to plan my wreck diving better. I’ve been a little bit better this year, but in 2009 I’m going to dive prepared and with a plan, based on diagrams which are usually readily available from some on-line source or other, and make more detailed notes on what I see and where I take photographs.

So all I can say is that the weather had warmed up to 20C (68F), and our maximum depth was 105 feet (yes, a reverse profile – apparently they’re not as bad as they’re made out to be), the visibility was worse than usual at maximum 20 feet, and we were out of the water by noon, which is pretty good as we had gone over to the American side of the river for that dive. After returning to Canada and checking into customs by radio right at the dock of our motel, I collected my bored wife and travelled the 4 hours back home in the midst of the long weekend traffic.

St. Lawrence Scuba Weekend, Saturday Night Party December 15, 2008

Posted by Chris Sullivan in Dive Log.
Tags: , , , ,
add a comment

After a good day of diving the Keystorm and the Kinghorn, the next step was the Saturday Night Barbecue. This was the Labour Day Weekend of 2006, and my first dive trip to the St. Lawrence River. Unfortunately, there had been rain through most of the day, and the evening was worse, with a constant moderate rain throughout. The barbecue was a metal barrel cut longitudinally in two, and filled with charcoal. Brad and Dave always act as cooks, and had various types of sis kabobs, as well as lots of side dishes. The barbecue was large enough for all those around to get some heat, and so stay a little bit drier than would otherwise have been possible.

Despite the weather, the turnout was good, and with the food delayed until about 10pm, the evening went pretty late, although my wife and I bowed out around 11 and left the partying the younger club members. As it turns out I could have stayed late as all boats were cancelled the next day due to the bad weather.

After running around in the morning of Sunday, September 3rd, 2006 trying to find out if the second day of diving was a “go” or not, we ended up having breakfast at Caiger’s, then fending for ourselves for lunch with food and wine that we’d brought with us. We ended up visiting with some shore divers from the club doing training off the water’s edge in Brockville, and watching some tech divers do some odd-looking drills about 50 feet from shore. Noone could really figure out what they were up to, even those who were tech divers at the time.

That evening, we went to the Keystorm Pub (named after the wreck which we were diving on the previous day) in downtown Brockville  for dinner, which had reasonably good food, and then called it a night. We all hoped for better weather the next day.

The pressure of sea water December 10, 2008

Posted by Chris Sullivan in Technical Diving.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
5 comments

Some time ago I wrote about a web page called Calchemy that uses dimensional analysis to do unit conversion, from simple arithmetic like metres to feet to complicated calculations in physics or electronics. The toughest, but best, part of using this calculator is getting the units to match. For instance, if you try to convert square metres to cubic feet you will get an error since the metric units have one less dimension than the imperial units (thus the name dimensional analysis).

I started thinking the other day about how to write decompression software, noting that many of the papers written by North American authors use feet of salt/sea water (FSW) to express ambient and tissue compartment pressures, even when it is below atmospheric pressure (e.g. a vacuum is -33 FSW because the pressure at a depth of 33 FSW is approximately one atmosphere).  For a while I was very confused by some literature because the pressures were expressed as absolute, so sea level was 33 FSW, and 100 FSW depth was called 133. It’s a little bizarre to think about things that way but it makes the calculations easier. So  diving in a mountain lake you may find yourself at -4 FSW at the start of the dive, for instance.

Anyone who was done diving calculations (say for the Enriched Air Specialty) should know that it is often necessary to convert gauge to absolute pressure by adding 33 feet to the depth, then convert back after the calculation from absolute to gauge by subtracting the same amount. It exactly the same rationale, but in diving education this is done explicitly, while in the scientific literature it’s buried in the numbers.

So in my quest to design decompression software, at least in my head, I decided that the best unit of pressure would be the Pascal. When weather forecasters in Canada bother to talk about atmospheric pressure to the public (Aviation is different, and still uses inches of Mercury), they use KiloPascals as their primary unit (standard pressure being 101.3 KPa)

In my previous post I noted I was having trouble converting the density of sea water (a built in unit in the program) to determine the depth of one atmosphere (another built in unit). I had similar trouble trying to use it to determine the conversion factor from FSW to Pa.

So finally I have figured it out. Pressure is force/area; and while we tend to associate this force with weight (i.e. pounds per square inch), weight varies from planet to planet so scientifically speaking we need to deal with weight as the force of gravity times the mass, not just the mass itself. So a Pascal is based on Newtons per square Metre, where a Newton is one kilogram metre per second per second. The acceleration of gravity is expressed as distance over time squared (metres per second per second) so force is simply mass times gravity, so pascals are kilograms times earth’s gravitational constant g. Standard Gravity (it varies by up to 1/2 percent in different parts of the Earth) is taken to be 9.80665 m/s²

The number of kilograms is simply the density (mass over volume, where volume is cubic centimetres, inches, or whatever) times the depth (simply measured in length). So by substitution the pressure is equal to the density times the depth times g.  So now I can put this into Calchemy without difficulty. All I do is enter the expression: dens_sea_water*meter*gn which is saying I want to convert the pressure exerted by 1 meter of sea water (gn is the term for g in Calchemy), and the result unit as Pascal. This yields the following result:

dens_sea_water*meter*gn ? pascal
= 10051.8 pascal

So the answer is that the pressure exerted by 1 metre of sea water is 10051.8 pascals, or 10.0518 kilopascals. You should recall from open water class that 1 atmosphere is about 1 bar is about 33 FSW is about 10 metres of sea water (MSW). 10 metres of sea water is 100.518 KPa, which is very close to the standard atmospheric pressure of 101.3 KPa so the answer is in the right zone.

For fresh water I get the following:

dens_water*meter*gn ? pascal
= 9806.65 pascal

This is a little less pressure than sea water, which you would expect. Finally, let’s ask Calchemy to do pounds per square inch for 10 metres of sea water. I change the Expression to 10*dens_sea_water*meter*gn to show I want 10 metres instead of 1, and change the result units to psi, to get:

10*dens_sea_water*meter*gn ? psi
= 14.5789 psi

So an atmosphere is about 14.7 PSI (when those of us still on Imperial units do calculations about scuba tanks, we use this number) so our answer for 10 metres of sea water is pretty close. If we want bar, we just change the result unit to bar and get:

10*dens_sea_water*meter*gn ? bar
= 1.00518 bar

Again, just what you’d expect. 1 bar is about 1 atmosphere which is about 14.7 PSI which is about 33 FSW.

What I really like about this little program is that the only units I really have to worry about are the ones which I use for input and output, namely depth (metres, feet, inches, etc.) and pressure (Pascals, PSI, bar, etc.). I didn’t have to worry about the units for water density or the gravitational constant.

The difficulty with pressure is that it is based on force. We users of the imperial system (Canada is particularly divided using imperial and metric in day-to-day life) use pounds as a measure of force as well as mass. Whether the term refers to force or mass depends on the context – it may be different from application to application.

First Diving Trip to the St. Lawrence River December 9, 2008

Posted by Chris Sullivan in Dive Log.
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
1 comment so far

When I first started diving the upper St. Lawrence River wasn’t a well known dive site like it is now. The lower St. Lawrence had difficult dives available for the early pioneers, like the Empress of Ireland, which was explored by a bunch of intrepid divers from Syracuse New York and other places around 1970. I noticed this when reading the book, Dark Descent, because at the time I lived in Syracuse New York but alas I was only 15 and had no interest in diving at the time.

There is much good diving today stretching along the river from Lake Ontario to Brockville and beyond. Before 15 years or so ago, the visibility was terrible, as the Zebra Mussels had yet to take over everything and clean up the water. Today the visibility often 30-50 feet, and makes for good diving. The other terrific thing about the area is that in the late summer, warm water from near the surface of Lake Ontario flows into the river, so the temperatures from early July to mid-September can exceed 20 degrees Celsius (68F) right down to the bottom. I don’t think there is any warmer diving available anywhere in Canada at those depths.

So we make two trips there each year, although my first time in 2006 I went on the Labour Day Weekend trip, having missed the July trip for the PADI Wreck Diving Course because I was in Los Cabos. I also took my wife on this trip, as I’d been told about a resort called “Caigers” in the vicinity. Most the dive club stayed at the run-down Bridge Island Motel so most of the social activities were centred there. So on the Friday of the long weekend we drove the 3 1/2 hours to Caigers, having to stop and ask direction at one point to find our “resort”. It turned out that other than being on the river and having some docks for fishing and diving boats, it was just another somewhat run-down motel (although Bridge Island is considerably further along). I noted the moth eaten curtains as I entered our small room, but at least it had a coffee maker and a bar fridge so we could have some of the comforts of home.

It’s an easy drive from my home. I can be on highway 404 in 12 minutes from house, and exiting onto highway 401 (at kilometer 375) you can drive to exit 675 and be 5 minutes from Bridge Island, which is about 5-10 minutes from Caigers. Too bad about the weather. It was cloudy for all of the weekend and raining for most of it. This really put a damper on my wife’s spirits. We seem to encounter more than our fair share of bad weather when we travel, poor thing, so she got to stay inside a lot in a rather depressing room while I went out diving.

If you like traditional breakfasts, they offer that at Caigers. While dining there I ran into a diver from Windsor I’d met in the Turks and Caicos and we chatted for a while. We had both wanted to go to Cozumel on that trip and ended up in Turks because of Hurricane Wilma. He thought that Cozumel was way better than Turks but I hadn’t yet been to the former so had no opinion on that.